Details about Danny Campbell

Access statistics for papers by Danny Campbell.

Last updated 2023-01-01. Update your information in the RePEc Author Service.

Short-id: pca385

Working Papers

2016

1. Accommodating satisficing behavior in stated choice experiments
   2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association
   See also Journal Article Accommodating satisficing behaviour in stated choice experiments, European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation (2019) View citations (1) (2019)
2. Using geographically weighted choice models to account for spatial heterogeneity of preferences
   Working Papers, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw View citations (1)
   See also Journal Article Using Geographically Weighted Choice Models to Account for the Spatial Heterogeneity of Preferences, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell (2018) View citations (8) (2018)

2015

3. Disentangling the Influence of Knowledge on Processing Strategies in Choice Modelling
   Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics, University of St. Andrews, School of Geography and Sustainable Development
4. Spatial heterogeneity of willingness to pay for forest management
   Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics, University of St. Andrews, School of Geography and Sustainable Development View citations (9)
   Also in Working Papers, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw (2015) View citations (11)
   See also Journal Article Spatial Heterogeneity of Willingness to Pay for Forest Management, Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer (2017) View citations (39) (2017)

2014

5. Addressing elimination and selection by aspects decision rules in discrete choice experiments: does it matter?
   2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association
6. Position bias in best-worst scaling surveys: a case study on trust in institutions
   2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association View citations (5)
   See also Journal Article Position Bias in Best-worst Scaling Surveys: A Case Study on Trust in Institutions, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (2015) View citations (32) (2015)

2012

7. Exploring cost heterogeneity in recreational demand
   Working Papers, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit
8. Investigating Scale Heterogeneity in Latent Class Models
   Working Papers, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit
9. Labelling effects in discrete choice experiments
   Working Papers, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit View citations (2)
10. Using Benefit Transfer Techniques to Estimate the Value of achieving ’Good Ecological’ Status in Irish Water Bodies
    Research Reports, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit View citations (2)

2011

11. Choosing ‘buy none’ in food choice analysis: the role of utility balance
    85th Annual Conference, April 18-20, 2011, Warwick University, Coventry, UK, Agricultural Economics Society
12. Demand for improved food safety and quality: a cross-regional comparison
    85th Annual Conference, April 18-20, 2011, Warwick University, Coventry, UK, Agricultural Economics Society
13. Estimating the Value of Achieving ‘Good Ecological Status’ under the Water Framework Directive in the Boyne River Catchment: A Mixed Multinomial Logit Approach
    Working Papers, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit View citations (1)
14. The effect of using labelled alternatives in stated choice experiments: an exploration focusing on farmland walking trails in Ireland
    85th Annual Conference, April 18-20, 2011, Warwick University, Coventry, UK, Agricultural Economics Society View citations (1)

2010

15. Attribute processing in environmental choice analysis: implications for willingness to pay
    84th Annual Conference, March 29-31, 2010, Edinburgh, Scotland, Agricultural Economics Society View citations (13)
16. Combining discrete and continuous mixing approaches to accommodate heterogeneity in price sensitivities in environmental choice analysis
    84th Annual Conference, March 29-31, 2010, Edinburgh, Scotland, Agricultural Economics Society View citations (5)

2008

17. Mapping preferences for the restoration of environmental damage caused by illegal dumping
    82nd Annual Conference, March 31 - April 2, 2008, Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester, UK, Agricultural Economics Society

2007

18. Combining mixed logit models and random effects models to identify the determinants of willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements
    81st Annual Conference, April 2-4, 2007, Reading University, UK, Agricultural Economics Society View citations (74)
19. Incorporating Discontinuous Preferences into the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments
    Working Papers in Economics, University of Waikato View citations (5)
    See also Journal Article Incorporating Discontinuous Preferences into the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments, Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer (2008) View citations (157) (2008)
20. Using Choice Experiments to Explore the Spatial Distribution of Willingness to Pay for Rural Landscape Improvements
    Working Papers in Economics, University of Waikato View citations (7)
    See also Journal Article Using Choice Experiments to Explore the Spatial Distribution of Willingness to Pay for Rural Landscape Improvements, Environment and Planning A (2009) View citations (82) (2009)

2006

21. BENEFIT ESTIMATES FOR LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS: SEQUENTIAL BAYESIAN DESIGN AND RESPONDENTS’ RATIONALITY IN A CHOICE EXPERIMENT STUDY
    Working Papers, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc
22. Integrating landscape improvement indices and discrete choice experiments: evidence from the Rural Environment Protection Scheme in Ireland
    Working Papers, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc View citations (7)
23. Lexicographic Preferences in Discrete Choice Experiments: Consequences on Individual-Specific Willingness to Pay Estimates
    Sustainability Indicators and Environmental Valuation Working Papers, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) View citations (21)
    Also in Working Papers, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (2006) View citations (19)
24. Lexicographic preferences for rural environmental landscape improvements: implications on individual-specific willingness to pay estimates
    Working Papers, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc
25. Quantifying the landscape benefits arising from the Rural Environment Protection Scheme: results from a public survey
    Working Papers, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc View citations (2)
26. Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Derive Individual-Specific WTP Estimates for Landscape Improvements under Agri-Environmental Schemes: Evidence from the Rural Environment Protection Scheme in Ireland
    Sustainability Indicators and Environmental Valuation Working Papers, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) View citations (11)
    Also in Working Papers, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (2006) View citations (9)
27. Using mixed logit models to derive individual-specific WTP estimates for landscape improvements under agri-environmental schemes: evidence from the Rural Environment Protection Scheme in Ireland
    Working Papers, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc View citations (12)

Journal Articles

2022

1. Measuring Time Preferences Using Stated Credit Repayment Choices
   Journal of Quantitative Economics, 2022, 20, (1), 43-67

2021

2. Preferences for coastal and marine conservation in Vietnam: Accounting for differences in individual choice set formation
   Ecological Economics, 2021, 180, (C) View citations (9)
3. Putting your best fish forward: Investigating distance decay and relative preferences for fish conservation
   Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2021, 108, (C) View citations (2)
4. Spatial clustering of willingness to pay for ecosystem services
   Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2021, 72, (3), 673-697 View citations (5)

2020

5. Does attribute order influence attribute-information processing in discrete choice experiments?
   Resource and Energy Economics, 2020, 60, (C) View citations (4)
6. Linking urban air pollution with residents’ willingness to pay for greenspace: A choice experiment study in Beijing
   Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2020, 104, (C) View citations (15)
7. The use of latent variable models in policy: A road fraught with peril?
   Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, 2020, 09, (3) View citations (2)

2019

8. Accommodating satisficing behaviour in stated choice experiments
   European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2019, 46, (1), 133-162 View citations (1)
   See also Working Paper Accommodating satisficing behavior in stated choice experiments, 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts (2016) (2016)
9. Including Opt-Out Options in Discrete Choice Experiments: Issues to Consider
   The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2019, 12, (1), 1-14 View citations (15)

2018

10. Including Value Orientations in Choice Models to Estimate Benefits of Wildlife Management Policies
    Ecological Economics, 2018, 151, (C), 70-81 View citations (8)
11. Taboo trade-off aversion: A discrete choice model and empirical analysis
    Journal of choice modelling, 2018, 27, (C), 37-49 View citations (5)
12. The link between response time and preference, variance and processing heterogeneity in stated choice experiments
    Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2018, 88, (C), 18-34 View citations (13)
13. Using Geographically Weighted Choice Models to Account for the Spatial Heterogeneity of Preferences
    Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2018, 69, (3), 606-626 View citations (8)
    See also Working Paper Using geographically weighted choice models to account for spatial heterogeneity of preferences, Working Papers (2016) View citations (1) (2016)
14. Using eye tracking to account for attribute non-attendance in choice experiments
    European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2018, 45, (3), 333-365 View citations (24)

2017

15. Disentangling the influence of knowledge on attribute non-attendance
    Journal of choice modelling, 2017, 24, (C), 36-50 View citations (27)
16. Preferences for public involvement in health service decisions: a comparison between best-worst scaling and trio-wise stated preference elicitation techniques
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2017, 18, (9), 1107-1123 View citations (2)
17. Response time in online stated choice experiments: the non-triviality of identifying fast and slow respondents
    Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2017, 6, (1), 17-35 View citations (11)
18. Spatial Heterogeneity of Willingness to Pay for Forest Management
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 2017, 68, (3), 705-727 View citations (39)
    See also Working Paper Spatial heterogeneity of willingness to pay for forest management, Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics (2015) View citations (9) (2015)
19. Students’ preferences for attributes of postgraduate economics modules: Evidence from a multi-profile best-worst scaling survey
    International Review of Economics Education, 2017, 24, (C), 18-27 View citations (1)
20. The Determinants of Brownfields Redevelopment in England
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 2017, 67, (2), 261-283 View citations (12)

2015

21. Accounting for Attribute‐Level Non‐Attendance in a Health Choice Experiment: Does it Matter?
    Health Economics, 2015, 24, (7), 773-789 View citations (18)
22. Learning, fatigue and preference formation in discrete choice experiments
    Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2015, 119, (C), 345-363 View citations (30)
23. Position Bias in Best-worst Scaling Surveys: A Case Study on Trust in Institutions
    American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2015, 97, (2), 526-545 View citations (32)
    See also Working Paper Position bias in best-worst scaling surveys: a case study on trust in institutions, 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota (2014) View citations (5) (2014)

2014

24. Behavioral implications of providing real incentives in stated choice experiments
    Journal of Economic Psychology, 2014, 45, (C), 102-116 View citations (20)
25. Bounding WTP distributions to reflect the ‘actual’ consideration set
    Journal of choice modelling, 2014, 11, (C), 4-15 View citations (24)
26. Elimination and selection by aspects in health choice experiments: Prioritising health service innovations
    Journal of Health Economics, 2014, 38, (C), 10-22 View citations (26)
27. Heterogeneity in the WTP for recreational access: distributional aspects
    Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2014, 57, (8), 1200-1219 View citations (15)

2013

28. Combining discrete and continuous mixing distributions to identify niche markets for food
    European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2013, 40, (2), 287-312 View citations (18)
29. It’s not that I don’t care, I just don’t care very much: confounding between attribute non-attendance and taste heterogeneity
    Transportation, 2013, 40, (3), 583-607 View citations (60)
30. Models of Site-choice for Walks in Rural Ireland: Exploring Cost Heterogeneity
    Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2013, 64, (2), 446-466 View citations (7)

2012

31. Cost thresholds, cut-offs and sensitivities in stated choice analysis: Identification and implications
    Resource and Energy Economics, 2012, 34, (3), 396-411 View citations (30)
32. Estimating the Value of Achieving “Good Ecological Status”in the Boyne River Catchmentin Ireland Using Choice Experiments
    The Economic and Social Review, 2012, 43, (3), 397-422 View citations (9)

2011

33. A Holistic vs. an Attribute‐based Approach to Agri‐Environmental Policy Valuation: Do Welfare Estimates Differ?
    Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2011, 62, (2), 305-329 View citations (27)
34. Estimating the welfare impacts of agricultural landscape change in Ireland: a choice experiment approach
    Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2011, 54, (8), 1019-1039 View citations (11)
35. Non-attendance to attributes in environmental choice analysis: a latent class specification
    Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2011, 54, (8), 1061-1076 View citations (107)

2009

36. Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation
    European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2009, 36, (2), 151-174 View citations (196)
37. Using Choice Experiments to Explore the Spatial Distribution of Willingness to Pay for Rural Landscape Improvements
    Environment and Planning A, 2009, 41, (1), 97-111 View citations (82)
    See also Working Paper Using Choice Experiments to Explore the Spatial Distribution of Willingness to Pay for Rural Landscape Improvements, Working Papers in Economics (2007) View citations (7) (2007)

2008

38. Assessing the spatial dependence of welfare estimates obtained from discrete choice experiments
    Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 2008, 1, (2), 117-126 View citations (41)
39. Incorporating Discontinuous Preferences into the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 2008, 41, (3), 401-417 View citations (157)
    See also Working Paper Incorporating Discontinuous Preferences into the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments, Working Papers in Economics (2007) View citations (5) (2007)

2007

40. Benefit Estimates for Landscape Improvements: Sequential Bayesian Design and Respondents’ Rationality in a Choice Experiment
    Land Economics, 2007, 83, (4), 617-634 View citations (123)
41. Willingness to Pay for Rural Landscape Improvements: Combining Mixed Logit and Random‐Effects Models
    Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2007, 58, (3), 467-483 View citations (93)