Students’ preferences for attributes of postgraduate economics modules: Evidence from a multi-profile best-worst scaling survey
Keila Meginnis and
Danny Campbell ()
International Review of Economics Education, 2017, vol. 24, issue C, 18-27
In this study, we investigate Scottish postgraduate economics students’ preferences for module design. Using a multi-profile best-worst scaling survey, we find that students have clear preferences on how they wish their modules to be delivered, taught and assessed. Furthermore, using a discrete mixtures modelling approach we explain the heterogeneous nature of preferences for the module attributes and the students’ lexicographic preference orderings. We show how failing to address this leads to erroneous results and limits the ability to derive reliable prediction. The findings in this study should appeal to university staff involved in the design of postgraduate (as well as undergraduate) courses as it should help them better establish a coherent learning experience for students, through which students can attain their full academic potential.
Keywords: Taught postgraduate; Module choice; Student's preferences; Multi-profile best-worst scaling; Discrete mixtures model; Attribute non-attendance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C25 I21 I23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ireced:v:24:y:2017:i:c:p:18-27
Access Statistics for this article
International Review of Economics Education is currently edited by Guest, Ross
More articles in International Review of Economics Education from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().