 The role of choice in the transition to a funded pension systemRobert Palacios (rpalacios@worldbank.org) and Edward Whitehouse (edwardrwhitehouse@gmail.com) No 20109, Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes from The World Bank Abstract: A critical question in the transition to a funded, private pension system is whether the new private element is presented as a mandate or choice to current and future workers. This report sets out the spectrum of available options and looks at policy in 13 reforming countries-Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, El Salvador, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay, Croatia, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Poland, and the United Kingdom. It concludes that older workers are best excluded from reform because the economic benefits are small and the political resistance is likely to be large if they are included. However, a defined cut-off age is arbitrary for reasons of intergenerational equity and heterogeneity of portfolio composition and risk preferences within cohorts. A voluntary switch is preferred. The main objection is the resulting uncertainty over the numbers switching. Analysis of reforming countries shows, however, a consistent and rational pattern of switching. The paper concludes by discussing policy options for managing the switching process. Keywords: Debt Markets; Pensions&Retirement Systems; Emerging Markets; Gender and Law; Labor Policies (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wbk:hdnspu:20109 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes from The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20433. Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to econpapers@oru.se.
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.