Inductive Reasoning, Bounded Rationality and the Bar Problem

W. Brian Arthur

Working Papers from Santa Fe Institute

Abstract: This paper draws on modern psychology to argue that as humans, in economic decision contexts that are complicated or ill-defined, we use not deductive, but inductive reasoning. That is, in such contexts we induce a variety of working hypotheses or mental models, act upon the most credible, and replace hypotheses with new ones if they cease to work. Inductive reasoning leads to a rich psychological world in which an agent's hypotheses or mental models compete for survival against each other, in an environment formed by other agents' hypotheses or mental models---a world that is both evolutionary and complex. Inductive reasoning can be modeled in a variety of ways. The main body of the paper introduces and models a coordination problem---``the bar problem''---in which agents' expectations are forced to be subjective and to differ. It shows that while agents' beliefs never settle down, collectively they form and ``ecology" that does converge to an equilibrium pattern.

Date: 1994-03
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (203)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wop:safiwp:94-03-014

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Santa Fe Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Krichel (krichel@openlib.org).