When Curiosity Kills the Profits: an Experimental Examination
Julian Jamison and
Dean Karlan ()
Additional contact information
Julian Jamison: University of California, Berkeley & San Francisco
Experimental from EconWPA
Economic theory predicts that in a first-price auction with equal and observable valuations, bidders earn zero profits. Theory also predicts that if valuations are not common knowledge, then since it is weakly dominated to bid your valuation, bidders will bid less and earn positive profits. Hence, rational players in an auction game should prefer less public information. We are perhaps more used to seeing these results in the equivalent Bertrand setting. In our experimental auction, we find that individuals without information on each other's valuations earn more profits than those with common knowledge. Then, given a choice between the two sets of rules, half the individuals still preferred to have the public information. We discuss possible explanations, including ambiguity aversion.
Keywords: First-price auctions; experiments; value of information; common knowledge; ambiguity aversion; Bertrand; public information (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D44 D80 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 22
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: When curiosity kills the profits: An experimental examination (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpex:0505001
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Experimental from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().