Litigation and the Political Clout of the Tobacco Companies: Cigarette Taxes, Prices, and the Master Settlement Agreement
Frank Sloan () and
Justin Trogdon ()
HEW from EconWPA
The goal of our empirical analysis is to assess whether the changes in cigarette excise taxes and cigarette prices can be attributed to litigation brought by the states and the resulting settlements, holding other factors constant. Using pre-post as well as state excise taxes on beer as controls, the evidence provides support for the view that litigation changes the political equilibrium: state cigarette excise taxes were approximately $0.10 higher in the post-MSA period. For tobacco prices, the increases are attributable to the method the settlement used to structure payments as well as the market structure of the cigarette industry.
Keywords: Master Settlement Agreement; excise tax; tobacco (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I12 K13 L66 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea, nep-law and nep-pol
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 42
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Litigation and the Political Clout of the Tobacco Companies: Cigarette Taxes, Prices, and the Master Settlement Agreement (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwphe:0411002
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in HEW from EconWPA
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ().