EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Un modelo de decisión judicial previsional argentino

Carlos Salomón
Additional contact information
Carlos Salomón: Universidad de San Andrés

Microeconomics from EconWPA

Abstract: Following the separation of powers' models, this paper analyzes the behaviour of the Supreme Court in the Social Security's case Rolon Zappa (1986). Besides judicial independence, I suppose that the economic, social and legal conditions of the case influence the utility of the judges. I develop a game between five players: the Supreme Court, the Social Security Administration, the pensioner, the Executive and the Congress. As a result, the Court, at least in this particular case, acted strategically; had a long run horizont and did not take into account the macroeconomic and social context of that period.

Keywords: judicial game; separation of powers models; supreme court behaviour (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 D78 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-11-05, Revised 2006-04-02
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 30. Es un juego entre cuatro
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/mic/papers/0511/0511001.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpmi:0511001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Microeconomics from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().

 
Page updated 2017-09-29
Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpmi:0511001