Un modelo de decisión judicial previsional argentino
Additional contact information
Carlos Salomón: Universidad de San Andrés
Microeconomics from EconWPA
Following the separation of powers' models, this paper analyzes the behaviour of the Supreme Court in the Social Security's case Rolon Zappa (1986). Besides judicial independence, I suppose that the economic, social and legal conditions of the case influence the utility of the judges. I develop a game between five players: the Supreme Court, the Social Security Administration, the pensioner, the Executive and the Congress. As a result, the Court, at least in this particular case, acted strategically; had a long run horizont and did not take into account the macroeconomic and social context of that period.
Keywords: judicial game; separation of powers models; supreme court behaviour (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 D78 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-11-05, Revised 2006-04-02
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 30. Es un juego entre cuatro
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpmi:0511001
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Microeconomics from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().