Strategy-proof judgment aggregation
Franz Dietrich and
Christian List
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: John List
Public Economics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Abstract:
In the theory of judgment aggregation on connected propositions, an important question remains open: Which aggregation rules are manipulable and which are strategy-proof? We define manipulability and strategy- proofness in judgment aggregation, characterize all strategy-proof aggregation rules, and prove an impossibility theorem similar to the classic Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem. Among other ways to avoid the impossibility, we discuss weakening strategy-proofness itself. Comparing two prominent aggregation rules in the literature, we show that "conclusion-based voting" is strategy-proof, but generates incomplete judgments, while "premise-based voting" is only strategy-proof for "reason-oriented" individuals. Surprisingly, for "outcome-oriented" individuals, the two rules are strategically equivalent, generating identical judgments in equilibrium. Our results introduce game-theoretic considerations into judgment aggregation and have implications for debates on deliberative democracy.
Keywords: judgment aggregation; logic; strategic voting; strategy-proofness; characterization theorem; impossibility theorem; Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem; doctrinal paradox; discursive dilemma; premise-based procedure; conclusion-based procedure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D70 D71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 31 pages
Date: 2004-04-18, Revised 2005-10-31
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 31. pdf, prepared with latex
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)
Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/pe/papers/0404/0404007.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: STRATEGY-PROOF JUDGMENT AGGREGATION* (2007) 
Working Paper: Strategy-proof judgment aggregation (2007) 
Working Paper: Strategy-proof judgment aggregation (2005) 
Working Paper: Strategy-proof judgment aggregation (2005) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwppe:0404007
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Public Economics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).