Granny versus Game Theorst: Ambiguity in Experimental Games

Jürgen Eichberger, David Kelsey and Burkhard Schipper

No 17/2006, Bonn Econ Discussion Papers from University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE)

Abstract: We report on an experiment in which subjects choose actions in strategic games with either strategic complements or substitutes against a granny, a game theorist or other subjects. The games are selected in order to test predictions on the comparative statics of equilibrium with respect to changes in strategic ambiguity. We find that subjects face higher ambiguity while playing against the granny than playing against the game theorist if we assume that subjects are ambiguity averse. Moreover, under the same assumption, subjects choose more secure actions in games more prone to ambiguity which is in line with the predictions.

Keywords: Knightian uncertainty; Choquet expected utility; equilibrium under ambiguity; strategic uncertainty; experiments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C70 C72 C90 C91 D80 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/22962/1/bgse17_2006.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Granny Versus Game Theorist: Ambiguity in Experimental Games (2008)
Working Paper: Granny versus Game Theorist: Ambiguity in Experimental Games (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:bonedp:172006

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Bonn Econ Discussion Papers from University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().