EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Does Increased Teacher Accountability Decrease Leniency in Grading?

Patrick Puhani and Philip Yang

No 412, GLO Discussion Paper Series from Global Labor Organization (GLO)

Abstract: Because accountability may improve the comparability that is compromised by lenient grading, we compare exit exam outcomes in the same schools before and after a policy change that increased teacher accountability by anchoring grading scales. In particular, using a large administrative dataset of 364,445 exit exam outcomes for 72,889 students, we assess the effect of introducing centralized scoring standards into schools with higher and lower quality peer groups. We find that implementation of these standards increases scoring differences between the two school types by about 25 percent.

Keywords: Subjective performance evaluation; rating standards; policy reform; transparency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H83 I20 I28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eur and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/204510/1/GLO-DP-0412.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Does increased teacher accountability decrease leniency in grading? (2020) Downloads
Working Paper: Does Increased Teacher Accountability Decrease Leniency in Grading? (2019) Downloads
Working Paper: Does Increased Teacher Accountability Decrease Leniency in Grading? (2019) Downloads
Working Paper: Does Increased Teacher Accountability Decrease Leniency in Grading? (2019) Downloads
Working Paper: Does increased teacher accountability decrease leniency in grading? (2019) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:glodps:412

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in GLO Discussion Paper Series from Global Labor Organization (GLO) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:zbw:glodps:412