Matching donations without crowding out? Some theoretical considerations and a field experiment
Maja Adena () and
Steffen Huck ()
VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy from Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association
In this paper, we present evidence from a large-scale natural experiment in which different fundraising schemes are tested and compared: lead donor, standard linear matching (1:1), and an alternative matching scheme in which the matching amount goes to another project. The lead donor treatment, in comparison to other treatments, generates high average donations but relatively low participation rate. In the case of the standard linear matching scheme (1:1) we find, similarly to Huck and Rasul (2011), a crowding-out effect, which reduces significantly the average donation given. However, in our case, the traditional linear matching scheme (1:1) increases significantly the participation rate such that the overall return per mail-out is also higher. The alternative matching scheme increases significantly the response rate without generating the above crowding out effect.
JEL-codes: C93 D12 D64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Matching donations without crowding out? Some theoretical considerations and a field experiment (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:vfsc15:113209
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy from Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().