How effective is carbon pricing? A machine learning approach to policy evaluation
Jan Abrell,
Mirjam Kosch and
Sebastian Rausch
No 21-039, ZEW Discussion Papers from ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research
Abstract:
While carbon taxes are generally seen as a rational policy response to climate change, knowledge about their performance from an expost perspective is still limited. This paper analyzes the emissions and cost impacts of the UK CPS, a carbon tax levied on all fossil-fired power plants. To overcome the problem of a missing control group, we propose a policy evaluation approach which leverages economic theory and machine learning for counterfactual prediction. Our results indicate that in the period 2013-2016 the CPS lowered emissions by 6.2 percent at an average cost of €18 per ton. We find substantial temporal heterogeneity in tax-induced impacts which stems from variation in relative fuel prices. An important implication for climate policy is that in the short run a higher carbon tax does not necessarily lead to higher emissions reductions or higher costs.
JEL-codes: C54 L94 Q48 Q52 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cmp, nep-ene, nep-env and nep-reg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/233873/1/1757137602.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: How effective is carbon pricing?—A machine learning approach to policy evaluation (2022) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:zewdip:21039
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in ZEW Discussion Papers from ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().