COMPARING THE FORECASTING ACCURACY OF PREDICTION MARKETS AND POLLS FOR TAIWAN’S PRESIDENTIAL AND MAYORAL ELECTIONS
Chen-yan Tung,
Tzu-Chuan Chou,
Jih-wen Lin and
Hsin-Yi Lin
Journal of Prediction Markets, 2011, vol. 5, issue 3, 1-26
Abstract:
This paper devises a methodology to compare the accuracy of prediction markets and polls. The data of the Exchange of Future Events (xFuture) for Taiwan’s 2006 mayoral elections and 2008 presidential election show that the prediction markets outperform the opinion polls in various indices of accuracy. In terms of the last forecast before the election date, the accuracy of the prediction markets is 3 to 10 percent higher than that of the opinion polls. When comparing the accuracy of historical forecasts, the prediction markets outperform the polls in 93 to 100 percent of the cases. Moreover, the average accuracy of the prediction markets is 9 to 10 percent higher than that of the polls, with a standard deviation more than 2 percent less than that of the polls. To examine the robustness of these comparisons, this paper conducts two tests including daily forecast and normalized accuracy, and finds that the prediction markets successfully pass the tests with a significantly better accuracy than the polls.
Keywords: prediction markets; opinion polls; forecast accuracy; 2006 Taipei mayoral election; 2006 Kaohsiung mayoral election; 2008 Taiwan presidential election. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://ubplj.org/index.php/jpm/article/view/490 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:buc:jpredm:v:5:y:2011:i:3:p:1-26
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.predictio ... ex_files/Page418.htm
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Prediction Markets is currently edited by Leighton Vaughan Williams, Nottingham Business School
More articles in Journal of Prediction Markets from University of Buckingham Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dominic Cortis, University of Malta ().