A Test Between Unemployment Theories Using Matching Data

Melvyn Coles and Barbara Petrongolo

CEP Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Performance, LSE

Abstract: This paper tests whether aggregate matching is consistent with unemployment being mainly due to search frictions or due to job queues. Using U.K. data and correcting for temporal aggregation bias, estimates of the random matching function are consistent with previous work in this field, but random matching is formally rejected by the data. The data instead support 'stock-flow' matching. Estimates find that around 40 per cent of newly unemployed workers match quickly - they are interpreted as being on the short-side of their skill markets. The remaining workers match slowly, their re-employment rates depending statistically on the inflow of new vacancies and not on the vacancy stock. Having failed to match with existing vacancies, these workers wait for the arrival of new job vacancies. The results have important policy implications, particularly with reference to the design of optimal unemployment insurance programs.

Keywords: Matching; Unemployment; Temporal aggregation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E24 J41 J63 J64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lab
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp0570.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: A test between unemployment theories using matching data (2003)
Working Paper: A Test between Unemployment Theories Using Matching Data (2003)
Working Paper: A Test Between Unemployment Theories Using Matching Data (2002)
Working Paper: A test between unemployment theories using matching data (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0570

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEP Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Performance, LSE
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().