Subjective Well-Being and Income: Is there any Evidence of Satiation?

Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers

No 4222, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: Many scholars have argued that once “basic needs” have been met, higher income is no longer associated with higher in subjective well-being. We assess the validity of this claim in comparisons of both rich and poor countries, and also of rich and poor people within a country. Analyzing multiple datasets, multiple definitions of “basic needs” and multiple questions about well-being, we find no support for this claim. The relationship between well-being and income is roughly linear-log and does not diminish as incomes rise. If there is a satiation point, we are yet to reach it.

Keywords: subjective well-being; happiness; satiation; basic needs; Easterlin paradox (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D60 I30 N30 O10 O40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (219)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp4222.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Subjective Well-Being and Income: Is There Any Evidence of Satiation? (2013)
Working Paper: Subjective Well-Being and Income: Is There Any Evidence of Satiation? (2013)
Working Paper: Subjective Well?Being and Income: Is There Any Evidence of Satiation? (2013)
Working Paper: Subjective Well-Being and Income: Is There Any Evidence of Satiation? (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4222

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().