Endogenous Political Legitimacy: The Tudor Roots of England’s Constitutional Governance

Avner Greif and Jared Rubin

Working Papers from Chapman University, Economic Science Institute

Abstract: This paper highlights the importance of endogenous changes in the foundations of legitimacy for political regimes. Specifically, it highlights the central role of legitimacy changes in the rise of constitutional monarchy in England. It first highlights the limitations of the consensus view regarding this transition, which claims that Parliament’s military power enabled it to force constitutional monarchy on the Crown after 1688. It then turns to define legitimacy and briefly elaborates a theoretical framework enabling a historical study of this unobservable variable. The third and primary section substantiates that the low-legitimacy, post-Reformation Tudor monarchs of the 16th century promoted Parliament to enhance their legitimacy, thereby changing the legislative process from the Crown-and-Parliament to the Crown-in-Parliament that still prevails in England.

Keywords: political legitimacy; England; Reformation; Parliament; constitutional governance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D02 D73 N33 N44 P48 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gro, nep-his and nep-pol
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/esi_working_papers/381/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:chu:wpaper:23-01

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Chapman University, Economic Science Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Megan Luetje ().