EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Vulnerabilities and Benefits of Mega-Scale Agri-Food Processing Facilities in Canada

Jared Carlberg
Additional contact information
Jared Carlberg: University of Manitoba

SPP Briefing Papers, 2020, vol. 13, issue 20

Abstract: This paper explores the vulnerabilities associated with mega-scale agri-food processing facilities in the wake of Canada’s COVID-19 outbreak and associated disruptions to the food supply chain and food security as the result of disease outbreak-induced plant closures. The current system of mega-scale facilities has come about as a result of powerful economic incentives associated with economies of size and scale, which allow larger-scale facilities to spread fixed costs across more units of output, leading to lower per-unit costs, greater levels of profitability, and, in the case of the agri-food sector, lower prices and enhanced food security. Governmental and regulatory policies such as tax incentives for investment in large plants (to bring jobs into communities) and allowing the anti-competitive effects of larger/fewer plants to be a secondary consideration to efficiencies have also contributed to the phenomenon of large plant size. Unfortunately, however, increased plant size also requires more workers which can lead to increased risk of disease spread. Moreover, with fewer and larger plants, if a disease like COVID-19 is detected and a plant idled or shut down as a result, the impact of any individual plant being closed upon the food supply and food security is much greater.            Three potential strategic policy options to address this are explored. The first is the introduction of a series of smaller, regional facilities which would greater match commodity availability to processing capacity. For example, Canada’s cattle slaughter capacity does not closely resemble the location of its cattle herd. A second possible option would be the encouragement of alternative ownership structures such as the 1990s-era “New Generation Co-operative†which would be farmer-owned and geographically dispersed. The third (and most likely) option is the introduction of greater levels of mechanization, which would require fewer workers, and increased intra-plant distancing and safety measures for those workers.

Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/202 ... cessing-Carlberg.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:clh:briefi:v:13:y:2020:i:30

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in SPP Briefing Papers from The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bev Dahlby ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:clh:briefi:v:13:y:2020:i:30