Excess saving and low interest rates: Theory and empirical evidence

Peter Bofinger and Mathias Ries

No 12111, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: The debate on low real long-term interest rates is dominated by the loanable funds theory (LFT). 'Excess saving', above all due to demographic factors, is regarded as a primary cause of low rates. In this paper, we show that LFT is not an appropriate theoretical framework. It is based on a commodity paradigm ('real analysis') which cannot represent a financial system with a flow of funds consisting of money. In a 'monetary analysis' saving is disconnected from the supply of funds. Funds are provided by banks, which create money, and investors that are willing to give up liquidity. A simple model which is based on 'monetary analysis' is the IS/LM-model. In this model, even at the zero lower bound 'excess saving' is not possible. The empirical evidence for 'excess saving' is weak. At the global level and for the United States the net saving rate and the gross household saving rate have declined significantly since the 1980s. In line with the monetary analysis, a 'financing glut' can be identified for the United States for the period preceding the Great Recession. It was followed by a 'borrowing dearth'. For the postwar period, the real rates of the early 1980s can be identified as an outlier, and thus the trend decline since this period can be regarded as a reversion to the mean.

Keywords: Interest rates; Flow of funds; Monetary policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E43 E50 E52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac and nep-mon
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP12111 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12111

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP12111

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().