A Pure Hedonic Theory of Utility and Status: Unhappy but Effcient Invidious Comparisons

Pascal Courty and Merwan Engineer ()

No 12478, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: We examine status preferences where agents compare their own utility relative to the utilities of others, in addition to valuing own consumption. The utility functions are, therefore, implicit functions of each other. As long as status utility comparisons are not too intense, they do not affect either the competitive equilibrium or the set of efficient allocations. However, status utility comparison may substantially reduce average utility and dramatically increase utility inequality. Equating utility with happiness operationalizes the theory and provides an explanation to the puzzle of why invidious comparisons can generate so much unhappiness without much inefficiency. Our theory has very different welfare and political economy implications from other status theories, even when reduced form representations appear observationally equivalent.

Keywords: Conspicuous consumption; Inequality; Happiness; Rat race; Reference group; Status; Utility; Welfare (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hap, nep-hpe, nep-mic and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP12478 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Journal Article: A pure hedonic theory of utility and status: Unhappy but efficient invidious comparisons (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12478

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP12478

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().