Who Voted for Trump? Populism and Social Capital

Paola Giuliano and Romain Wacziarg

No 15140, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: We argue that low levels of social capital are conducive to the electoral success of populist movements. Using a variety of data sources for the 2016 US Presidential election at the county and individual levels, we show that social capital, measured either by the density of memberships in civic, religious and sports organizations or by generalized trust, is significantly negatively correlated with the vote share and favorability rating of Donald Trump around the time of the election.

Keywords: Social capital; Voting behavior; Populism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 Z1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-ltv, nep-pol and nep-soc
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP15140 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Working Paper: Who Voted for Trump? Populism and Social Capital (2020)
Working Paper: Who Voted for Trump? Populism and Social Capital (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:15140

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP15140

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().