EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Testing Willingness to Pay Elicitation Mechanisms in the Field: Evidence from Uganda

Jonathan de Quidt, Konrad Burchardi (), Selim Gulesci (), Benedetta Lerva and Stefano Tripodi

No 15809, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: Researchers frequently use variants of the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) mechanism to elicit willingness to pay (WTP). These variants involve numerous incentive-irrelevant design choices, some of which carry advantages for implementation but may deteriorate participant comprehension or trust in the mechanism, which are well-known problems with the BDM. We highlight three such features and test them in the field in rural Uganda, a relevant population for many recent applications. Comprehension is very high, and 86 percent of participants bid optimally for an induced-value voucher, with little variation across treatments. This gives confidence for similar applications, and suggests the comprehension-expediency trade-off is mild.

Keywords: Willingness to pay; Becker-degroot-marschak; Field experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C90 C93 D44 O12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm, nep-env and nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP15809 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Journal Article: Testing willingness to pay elicitation mechanisms in the field: Evidence from Uganda (2021) Downloads
Working Paper: Testing Willingness to Pay Elicitation Mechanisms in the Field: Evidence from Uganda (2021) Downloads
Working Paper: Testing Willingness to Pay Elicitation Mechanisms in the Field: Evidence from Uganda (2021) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:15809

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP15809

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:15809