The Todaro Paradox Revisited
Yves Zenou
No 5402, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers
Abstract:
The Todaro Paradox states that policies aimed at reducing urban unemployment are bound to backfire: they will raise rather than reduce urban unemployment. The aim of this paper is to re-examine this paradox in the context of efficiency wage and search-matching models. For that, we study a policy that consists in decreasing the urban unemployment benefit. In an efficiency wage model, we find that there is no Todaro paradox while this is not always true in a search-matching model since a decrease in the urban unemployment benefit can increase both urban employment and unemployment.
Keywords: Efficiency wages; Search-matching; Rural-urban migration; Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D83 J41 J64 O15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dev and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)
Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP5402 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
Related works:
Working Paper: The Todaro Paradox Revisited (2005) 
Working Paper: The Todaro Paradox Revisited (2005) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:5402
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP5402
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().