The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation

Rachel Glennerster, Abhijit Banerjee, Esther Duflo and Cynthia Kinnan

No 9437, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: This paper reports on the first randomized evaluation of the impact of introducing the standard microcredit group-based lending product in a new market. In 2005, half of 104 slums in Hyderabad, India were randomly selected for opening of a branch of a particular microfinance institution (Spandana) while the remainder were not, although other MFIs were free to enter those slums. Fifteen to 18 months after Spandana began lending in treated areas, households were 8.8 percentage points more likely to have a microcredit loan. They were no more likely to start any new business, although they were more likely to start several at once, and they invested more in their existing businesses. There was no effect on average monthly expenditure per capita. Expenditure on durable goods increased in treated areas, while expenditures on ?temptation goods? declined. Three to four years after the initial expansion (after many of the control slums had started getting credit from Spandana and other MFIs ), the probability of borrowing from an MFI in treatment and comparison slums was the same, but on average households in treatment slums had been borrowing for longer and in larger amounts. Consumption was still no different in treatment areas, and the average business was still no more profitable, although we find an increase in profits at the top end. We found no changes in any of the development outcomes that are often believed to be affected by microfinance, including health, education, and women?s empowerment. The results of this study are largely consistent with those of four other evaluations of similar programs in different contexts.

Keywords: Microfinance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D21 G21 O16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dem, nep-dev, nep-ent, nep-exp, nep-mfd and nep-nps
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (115)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP9437 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Journal Article: The Miracle of Microfinance? Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation (2015)
Working Paper: The Miracle of Microfinance? Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:9437

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP9437

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().