Policy-Development Monopolies: Adverse Consequences and Institutional Responses
Alexander V. Hirsch and
Kenneth W. Shotts
Additional contact information
Alexander V. Hirsch: CA Institute of Technology
Kenneth W. Shotts: Stanford University
Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business
Abstract:
We analyze a model of policymaking in which only one actor, e.g., a bureaucratic agency or a well-funded interest group, has the capacity to develop high-quality policy proposals. By virtue of her skills, this actor has an effective monopoly on policy development and thus can craft proposals that are good for herself but provide few benefits to decisionmakers who enact policies. We then examine institutional responses that decisionmakers can use to induce a policy-development monopolist to develop more-appealing proposals: (i) establishing in-house policy development capacity, (ii) delegating authority to an agent who counterbalances the monopolist's preferences, and (iii) fostering competition by policy entrepreneurs with different preferences. We apply our model to a diverse set of contexts, including bureaucratic policymaking in Japan, lobbying in term-limited state legislatures, regulation of banking and financial services, and administrative procedures for rulemaking in U.S. federal bureaucracies.
Date: 2015-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cba, nep-mfd and nep-reg
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/worki ... velopment-monopolies
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:stabus:3137
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Research Papers from Stanford University, Graduate School of Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().