The influence of different tillage practices on water content of soil and crop yield in vetch–winter wheat rotation compared to fallow–winter wheat rotation in a high altitude and cool climate

Zinnur Gozubuyuk, Ustun Sahin, Mesut Cemal Adiguzel, Ismail Ozturk and Ahmet Celik

Agricultural Water Management, 2015, vol. 160, issue C, 84-97

Abstract: Fallow–winter wheat crop rotation under conventional tillage conditions is an agricultural system widely used in semi-arid regions. Water content of soil required for seed germination and plant growth can be improved performing tillage practices. Moreover, a crop rotation allowing sustainable and continuous production can be created. Therefore, the effect of four different tillage practices in a Hungarian vetch–winter wheat crop rotation (CR1) compared to fallow–winter wheat crop rotation (CR2) for water use efficiency was investigated in a semi-arid region with a high altitude (∼1750m a.s.l.) for three years (2011–12, 2012–13 and 2013–14). Tillage practices consisted of; TS1: Conventional tillage (moldboard plough+cultivator+combined harrows+precision seeder); TS2: Reduced tillage-1 (cultivator+combined harrows+precision seeder); TS3: Reduced tillage-2 (rotary power harrow+precision seeder) and TS4: No-tillage (no-till seeder). Experiment was conducted applying randomized complete block design based on split-plot trial plan. The water content of soil in the CR1 was higher than the contents in the CR2. The TS4 practice significantly increased (P<0.01) the water content of soil in all measurement periods (sowing, winter, spring, harvesting and the whole year) and in soil layers (0–30cm, 30–60cm and 60–90cm) compared to the other tillage practices. Water contents of soil were the lowest in the TS1. For the 0–30-cm depth, compared to the TS1 practice, the TS4 practice provided higher water contents of soil by 21.3, 22.1, 14.4, 15.7 and 17.4% in sowing, winter, spring, harvesting and the whole year periods, respectively. Water contents in 30–60 and 60–90cm soil layers in the TS4 practice also were higher than the TS1 practice values. Higher water contents of soil of the sowing period in TS4 provided higher stand density. Although the amount of weeds in winter wheat plots was the highest in the TS4 practice (67.4kgha−1) when considering three-year average values, grain yield in TS4 was also high (2652kgha−1) and statistically similar to TS1 (2762kgha−1). There was no clear effect on water use efficiency of winter wheat of the no-tillage practice compared to conventional tillage practice. Stand density and fodder yield of vetch were the highest in TS4. Our results indicated that the no-till vetch–winter wheat rotation could be more suitable than the conventional tilled fallow–winter wheat rotation due to the opportunity of high crop production in semi-arid regions.

Keywords: No-tillage; Crop rotation; Water use efficiency; Weed and yield amount; Germination (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377415300494
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:160:y:2015:i:c:p:84-97

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.07.003

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().