Impact of different cropping systems and irrigation schedules on evapotranspiration, grain yield and groundwater level in the North China Plain

Hongyong Sun, Xiying Zhang, Xiujing Liu, Xiuwei Liu, Liwei Shao, Suying Chen, Jintao Wang and Xinliang Dong

Agricultural Water Management, 2019, vol. 211, issue C, 202-209

Abstract: Water shortage is the most limiting factors for the crop production in the North China Plain (NCP). The alternative cropping systems and the water-saving irrigation schedules are the main measures to reduce the groundwater level decline. In this study, APSIM model was used to simulate the effects of four different cropping systems (winter wheat and summer maize cropping system (WW-SM); winter wheat cropping system (WW); summer maize cropping system (SM); winter wheat –summer maize – spring maize cropping systems (WW-SM-sM)) under four different irrigation schedules (normal irrigation (NI); critical irrigation (CI); minimum irrigation (MI); and rain-fed (RF)) on evapotranspiration (ET), water use efficiency (WUE) groundwater table level and crop water productivities in the NCP. Results showed that the WW-SM cropping system had the higher grain yield and ET under NI, CI, MI, and RF conditions. Grain yield reduction (GYR) was decreased with the irrigation amount decreased for the WW cropping system, SM cropping system, and WW-SM-Sm cropping systems which ranged from 21.59% to 48.11%, from 16.71% to 46.93%, from 15.82% to 43.92%, and from 5.09% to 27.22% under the NI, CI, MI and RF irrigation schedules, respectively. For WUE and the economic water use efficiency (WUEe), WW-SM and WW-SM-sM had the higher value, WW and SM had the lower value. The differences for the different cropping systems were mostly caused by the grain yield and the soil evaporation. Meanwhile, the water-saving irrigation schedules and cropping systems both could reduce the groundwater table decline compared to that under normal irrigation and traditional cropping system. There all had the significant impact on groundwater table changes for both the irrigation schedules and cropping systems. However, water restriction will lead to crop yield reduction and water saving depending on the chosen alternative cropping systems and irrigation schedules. Results strongly suggest that the critical irrigation and WW-SM-sM cropping system could mitigate the groundwater over-exploitation and ensure the food safety in the NCP.

Keywords: Cropping systems; Irrigation schedules; Grain yield; Evapotranspiration; Groundwater table; APSIM (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837741830636X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:211:y:2019:i:c:p:202-209

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.046

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().