Assessment of AquaCrop model in simulating maize canopy cover, soil-water, evapotranspiration, yield, and water productivity for different planting dates and densities under irrigated and rainfed conditions

Rupinder Sandhu and Suat Irmak

Agricultural Water Management, 2019, vol. 224, issue C, -

Abstract: A well-tested crop model can be an important tool in assessment of different crop management scenarios to improve crop yield and water productivity. In this study, the FAO AquaCrop model was evaluated for predicting maize (Zea mays L.) canopy cover (CC), available soil-water (ASW), grain yield, crop evapotranspiration (ETc), and water use efficiency (WUE) when grown at three different planting dates and densities under rainfed and subsurface drip-irrigated conditions in Nebraska, USA. The model adequately simulated CC in 2011 with root mean squared error (RMSE) and model efficiency (EF) in the range of 5.3 to 12.7% and 0.42 to 0.94, respectively; while in drier 2012, CC was substantially under-predicted with higher RMSE of 24.4%. ASW was consistently underestimated in both years with negative EF value for most treatments in 2011, while in 2012, this trend was more pronounced in irrigated treatments, especially during mid-season. ETc estimates were marginal with prediction error of up to 15% in 2011 and 18% in 2012, and overall RMSE of 35 mm for both years. Simulated grain yield was acceptable in 2011 with deviations from measured data up to 8% while in 2012, the deviations were much higher up to 40% for rainfed treatments with overestimations in both years. The errors in ETc and yield simulations are considered high, especially when considering the model application in water-limiting or/and rainfed conditions, and low-yielding areas in which these errors can be a substantial portion of the total yields produced and in seasonal total ETc from production fields and can cause challenges for growers and decision-makers. The overestimation of yield and underestimation of ETc resulted in overestimation of WUE, producing inconsistent estimates in both years. Detailed analyses of model performance and potential reasons for the discrepancies and areas that require improvements in the model are presented.

Keywords: Model performance; Available soil-water; Water use efficiency; Water stress; Deficit irrigation; Subsurface drip irrigation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377419302951
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:224:y:2019:i:c:14

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105753

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().