Influence of mulched drip irrigation on landscape scale evapotranspiration from farmland in an arid area

Zhenyu Zhang, Xiaoyu Li, Lijuan Liu, Yugang Wang and Yan Li

Agricultural Water Management, 2020, vol. 230, issue C

Abstract: Water-saving irrigation measures in arid areas affect evapotranspiration (ET) processes while conserving water. Mulched drip irrigation is considered the most efficient irrigation method because it distributes water uniformly in the soil, restricts deep percolation, and minimizes unproductive evaporation from soil. The effect of mulched drip irrigation on farmland ET during the growing season at a landscape scale remains unclear, despite being vital for developing optimal water resource management strategies in arid areas. To compare the effects of mulched drip irrigation and mulched border irrigation on ET, based on Landsat satellite imagery (2007–2009 with mulched border irrigation, and 2014–2016 with mulched drip irrigation), an improved Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL) model was used to evaluate ET for the two periods of an oasis at Sangong River Basin in the arid region of Northwest China. The results show that daily ET rates from farmland managed under mulched drip irrigation were on average 0.2–1 mm.d−1 higher than under mulched border irrigation between June and August. Correspondingly, the net radiation flux (R) increased 73.32 W·m-2 on average, and R was found to be the main determinant of the ET differences. Meanwhile, the average land surface albedo decreased by 20%, and negatively correlated with R (P < 0.05), indicating that the land surface albedo was the main factor affecting R. Furthermore, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) exhibited a significant correlation with land surface albedo. More importantly, the Temperature–Vegetation Dryness Index (TVDI) under mulched drip irrigation was found to be approximately 21% lower than that under mulched border irrigation, indicating that the soil moisture conditions of the farmland under mulched drip irrigation was significantly improved compared to mulched border irrigation. Namely, less water stress resulted in better developed canopy of the crops, which in turn captured more radiation and thus increased ET. In the end, the observed increases in landscape-scale ET under mulched drip irrigation in arid area resulted from enhanced productivity of the crops due to lessened drought stress.

Keywords: Mulched drip irrigation; Mulched border irrigation; Evapotranspiration; SEBAL model; Temperature-vegetation dryness index (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837741931265X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:230:y:2020:i:c:s037837741931265x

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105953

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().