Assessment of the modified two-source energy balance (TSEB) model for estimating evapotranspiration and its components over an irrigated olive orchard in Morocco
Ourrai Sara,
Aithssaine Bouchra,
Amazirh Abdelhakim,
Er-RAKI Salah,
Bouchaou Lhoussaine,
Jacob Frederic and
Chehbouni Abdelghani
Agricultural Water Management, 2024, vol. 298, issue C
Abstract:
Olives constitute a frequently grown crop in semi-arid areas. Therefore, accurate quantification of evapotranspiration (ET) within olive groves is crucial to enhance agricultural water productivity and promote their resilience to water scarcity and future climate scenarios. In the present work, we assessed the accuracy of 3 versions of the Two-Source-Energy-Balance (TSEB) model, the first one “TSEB-SPT” using a standard Priestley-Taylor coefficient (αPT) to estimate the transpiration, the second one called “TSEB-CPT” constrained by a computed αPT using measured ET along with the equilibrium term, and the third one “TSEB-SM” where soil moisture is used as an additional constraint to improve the soil evaporation. The 3 models were applied over an irrigated olive orchard in the Tensift basin (Morocco) during two growing periods of 2003 and 2004. The comparison with ground-based flux measurements from Eddy-Covariance tower and sap flow data revealed that the TSEB-SPT model overestimates ET with an average relative error of 87% and a percentage bias of ‐78% during the two growing seasons. Conversely, TSEB-SM and TSEB-CPT improved ET estimates as compared to TSEB-SPT, with mean relative errors of 31% and 24% and an average percentage bias of 0.6% and ‐7.4%, respectively. For ET partitioning, TSEB-SM appears to be less effective in estimating transpiration, while the simulated transpiration by TSEB-CPT fits well the actual one with a root mean square error of 0.27 mm, mainly during the summer of 2003. These results open a path for future improvements: by reviewing the calibration procedure of αPT, and implementing alternative formulas to compute the evaporation, the TSEB-SM could be potentially a robust tool for monitoring the seasonal variation of ET and its partitioning over a heterogeneous canopy cover.
Keywords: Evapotranspiration; Priestley-Taylor coefficient; Trees; ET partitioning; Arid zones (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424001963
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:298:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424001963
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108861
Access Statistics for this article
Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns
More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().