Limited choice in college admissions: An experimental study

Wei-Cheng Chen, Yi-Yi Chen and Yi-Cheng Kao

Games and Economic Behavior, 2018, vol. 108, issue C, 295-316

Abstract: This paper investigates a college admissions problem in which students' choice set is limited by colleges' strategic actions, such as early decision programs in the US or simultaneous entrance examinations in Asia, in order to prevent multiple applications. We call this action the conflicting strategy and conduct laboratory experiments to explore the problem. We argue that colleges' prestige and students' uncertainty about admissions outcomes are two important factors. Our model and experimental results demonstrate that when uncertainty is high and the prestige difference is low, a lower-ranked college can obtain more desired students through the conflicting strategy. Moreover, through this strategy, students with stronger preferences for a higher-ranked college have a higher chance to be accepted, which could result in an increase of students' aggregate welfare.

Keywords: Matching; Simultaneous screening; Early decision; Experiments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C78 C92 D82 I23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089982561730221X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:108:y:2018:i:c:p:295-316

DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2017.12.002

Access Statistics for this article

Games and Economic Behavior is currently edited by E. Kalai

More articles in Games and Economic Behavior from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().