 Where is the value? The impacts of sow gestation crate laws on pork supply and consumer value perceptionsBenjamin Blemings, Peilu Zhang and Clinton L. Neill Food Policy, 2023, vol. 117, issue C Abstract: Despite varying farm animal welfare laws being enacted and considered, it is unclear and unknown whether they generate sufficient benefits to justify their costs. This study asks how sow gestation crate laws that dictate minimum crate size, a particular farm animal welfare law, impact meat production and the subsequent value that consumers place on meat produced under the laws. An observational analysis leverages the 8 states that have implemented laws regarding gestating sow crates in a difference-in-differences framework using staggered adoption robust estimators. We then perform a consumer preference experiment using a contingent valuation design with treatment effects to separate out the heterogeneous beliefs about animal welfare law effects. The results of the study show that such laws initially reduce gross income and supply, but only gross income recovers. For consumers, they value the corresponding pork products more in accordance with their animal welfare beliefs but not quality. Such information on costs and benefits should be considered in future laws relating to gestation crate bans. Keywords: Farm animal welfare; Preference experiment; Hog production (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:117:y:2023:i:c:s0306919223000453 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102447 Access Statistics for this article Food Policy is currently edited by J. Kydd More articles in Food Policy from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.