Generous by default: A field experiment on designing defaults that align with past behaviour on charitable giving

Guglielmo Briscese

Journal of Economic Psychology, 2019, vol. 74, issue C

Abstract: Defaults can influence behaviour in many contexts, from savings to organ donations registrations, but can also reduce an individual’s perception of control if they don’t take into account individual preferences. This paper examines defaults in a charitable giving setting where a preference for control might limit the role of the default option. We run a field experiment with an NGO hosting an online peer-to-peer micro-lending platform. Lenders, who had their microloans fully repaid but had taken no action for over one year, were invited to use their money in one of four ways: withdraw, lend to a new borrower, donate to the NGO, or leave idle. In the control condition, there was no default. In the ‘default loan’ and ‘default donation’ treatments, lenders were told that if they did not take any action their money would automatically be re-lent to a new borrower or donated to the NGO respectively. We find that both defaults increase the proportion of individuals giving and the amount given, compared to the control, and that the increase was largest in the ‘default loan’ treatment. This suggests that aligning defaults with past behavior can increase their effectiveness.

Keywords: Defaults; RCT; Altruism; Choice architecture; Experiment; Charitable giving (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167487018305063
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:74:y:2019:i:c:s0167487018305063

DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2019.06.010

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Psychology is currently edited by G. Antonides and D. Read

More articles in Journal of Economic Psychology from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().