EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Who Responds More to Monetary Policy? Conventional Banks or Participation Banks

Fatih Macit

European Research Studies Journal, 2012, vol. XV, issue 2, 47-56

Abstract: In this paper I investigate whether there is a systematic difference between conventional banks and participation banks in terms of their response to monetary policy shocks. For this purpose I look at the quarterly loan growth of commercial banks and participation banks in Turkish banking sector and see whether the lending channel of monetary policy differs depending on bank type. At the same time I control for some bank specific variables, namely the log of real assets, the ratio of liquid assets to total assets and the ratio of equity to total assets. I find that participation banks show larger reaction to monetary policy. In terms of bank specific variables, banks with higher liquidity ratio tend to have higher loan growth whereas, banks with larger asset size have smaller loan growth.

Keywords: Lending Channel; Participation Banks; Commercial Banks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E51 E52 G21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ersj.eu/repec/ers/papers/12_2_p4.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Who responds more to monetary policy, conventional banks or participation banks? (2012) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ers:journl:v:xv:y:2012:i:2:p:47-56

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Research Studies Journal from European Research Studies Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marios Agiomavritis ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xv:y:2012:i:2:p:47-56