Aggregation level in stress testing models
Galina Hale,
John Krainer and
Erin McCarthy
No 2015-14, Working Paper Series from Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Abstract:
We explore the question of optimal aggregation level for stress testing models when the stress test is specified in terms of aggregate macroeconomic variables, but the underlying performance data are available at a loan level. Using standard model performance measures, we ask whether it is better to formulate models at a disaggregated level (?bottom up?) and then aggregate the predictions in order to obtain portfolio loss values or is it better to work directly with aggregated models (?top down?) for portfolio loss forecasts. We study this question for a large portfolio of home equity lines of credit. We conduct model comparisons of loan-level default probability models, county-level models, aggregate portfolio-level models, and hybrid approaches based on portfolio segments such as debt-to-income (DTI) ratios, loan-to-value (LTV) ratios, and FICO risk scores. For each of these aggregation levels we choose the model that fits the data best in terms of in-sample and out-of-sample performance. We then compare winning models across all approaches. We document two main results. First, all the models considered here are capable of fitting our data when given the benefit of using the whole sample period for estimation. Second, in out-of-sample exercises, loan-level models have large forecast errors and underpredict default probability. Average out-of-sample performance is best for portfolio and county-level models. However, for portfolio level, small perturbations in model specification may result in large forecast errors, while county-level models tend to be very robust. We conclude that aggregation level is an important factor to be considered in the stress-testing model design.
JEL-codes: C18 C52 G21 G28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 39 pages
Date: 2015-09-28
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-for and nep-rmg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/files/wp2015-14.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Aggregation level in stress testing models (2023) 
Journal Article: Aggregation Level in Stress-Testing Models (2020) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedfwp:2015-14
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
DOI: 10.24148/wp2015-14
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper Series from Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Research Library ().