Impacts of the Winter Pea Crop (Instead of Rapeseed) on Soil Microbial Communities, Nitrogen Balance and Wheat Yield

Cyrine Rezgui, Wassila Riah-Anglet, Marie Benoit, Pierre Yves Bernard, Karine Laval and Isabelle Trinsoutrot-Gattin
Additional contact information
Cyrine Rezgui: UniLaSalle, AGHYLE Research Unit UP 2018.C101, Rouen Team, 3 Rue du Tronquet, F-76134 Mont-Saint Aignan, France
Wassila Riah-Anglet: UniLaSalle, AGHYLE Research Unit UP 2018.C101, Rouen Team, 3 Rue du Tronquet, F-76134 Mont-Saint Aignan, France
Marie Benoit: ISARA, Higher Education Institution, 69007 Lyon, France
Pierre Yves Bernard: UniLaSalle, AGHYLE Research Unit UP 2018.C101, Rouen Team, 3 Rue du Tronquet, F-76134 Mont-Saint Aignan, France
Karine Laval: UniLaSalle, AGHYLE Research Unit UP 2018.C101, Rouen Team, 3 Rue du Tronquet, F-76134 Mont-Saint Aignan, France
Isabelle Trinsoutrot-Gattin: UniLaSalle, AGHYLE Research Unit UP 2018.C101, Rouen Team, 3 Rue du Tronquet, F-76134 Mont-Saint Aignan, France

Agriculture, 2020, vol. 10, issue 11, 1-21

Abstract: Due to legume-based systems improving several aspects of soil fertility, the diversification of agrosystems using legumes in crop succession is gaining increasing interest. The benefits of legumes aroused the interest of farmers in the association of the Economic and Environmental Interest Group (EEIG), who introduced the idea of using the winter pea instead of rapeseed in their crop succession. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of the winter pea compared to those of rapeseed, as a head crop of the rotation, on soil microbial communities, enzyme activities, nitrogen (N) balance and yields. The field experiment involved two farmer plots that were selected within the EEIG. In each plot, two crop successions, including winter pea–wheat and rapeseed–wheat with fertilized and unfertilized strips, were examined for two years. Three times a year, under the wheat crop, composite soil samples were collected at depths of 0–20 cm, for microbial abundance and enzyme activity analyses, and twice a year at a depth of 0–60 cm, for the measuring of the mineral N. The results showed that the rapeseed–wheat succession maintained or enhanced soil bacterial and fungal biomasses and their enzyme activities. The winter pea–wheat succession enriched the soil’s mineral N content more consistently than the rapeseed–wheat succession. The mineral N enhancement’s effect was maintained under the wheat crop. Overall, the impact of the winter pea was positive on the soil’s N dynamics, but wheat yields were equivalent regardless of the previous crop (winter pea or rapeseed with and without fertilization). In the Normandy region, as rapeseed requires a large amount of N fertilizer and pesticide to maintain the yield and quality of crop products, it is suitable to favor the introduction of the winter pea as the head crop of the rotation, which indirectly allows for a reduction in the costs of input production and use, the working time of farmers and environmental pollution.

Keywords: crop succession; winter pea; rapeseed; enzyme activities; microbial biomass; mineral N; yields (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/11/548/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/11/548/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:11:p:548-:d:445155

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan

More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().