Carbon Dioxide Fluxes and Carbon Stocks under Conservation Agricultural Practices in South Africa

Patrick Nyambo, Chiduza Cornelius and Tesfay Araya
Additional contact information
Patrick Nyambo: Department of Agronomy, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X-1314, Alice 5700, South Africa
Chiduza Cornelius: Department of Agronomy, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X-1314, Alice 5700, South Africa
Tesfay Araya: Department of Agronomy, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X-1314, Alice 5700, South Africa

Agriculture, 2020, vol. 10, issue 9, 1-13

Abstract: Understanding the impacts of agricultural practices on carbon stocks and CO 2 emission is imperative in order to recommend low emission strategies. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of tillage, crop rotation, and residue management on soil CO 2 fluxes, carbon stock, soil temperature, and moisture in the semi-arid conditions in the Eastern Cape of South Africa. The field trial was laid out as a split-split-plot design replicated three times. The main plots were tillage viz conventional tillage (CT) and no-till (NT). The sub-plots were allocated to crop rotations viz maize–fallow–maize (MFM), maize–oat–maize (MOM), and maize–vetch–maize (MVM). Crop residue management was in the sub-sub plots, viz retention (R+), removal (R−), and biochar (B). There were no significant interactions ( p > 0.05) with respect to the cumulative CO 2 fluxes, soil moisture, and soil temperature. Crop residue retention significantly increased the soil moisture content relative to residue removal, but was not different to biochar application. Soil tilling increased the CO 2 fluxes by approximately 26.3% relative to the NT. The carbon dioxide fluxes were significantly lower in R− (2.04 µmoL m −2 s −1 ) relative to the R+ (2.32 µmoL m −2 s −1) and B treatments (2.36 µmoL m −2 s −1 ). The carbon dioxide fluxes were higher in the summer (October–February) months compared to the winter period (May–July), irrespective of treatment factors. No tillage had a significantly higher carbon stock at the 0-5 cm depth relative to CT. Amending the soils with biochar resulted in significantly lower total carbon stock relative to both R+ and R−. The results of the study show that NT can potentially reduce CO2 fluxes. In the short term, amending soils with biochar did not reduce the CO 2 fluxes compared to R+, however the soil moisture increases were comparable.

Keywords: conservation agriculture; biochar; soil organic carbon; greenhouse gas (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/9/374/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/9/374/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:9:p:374-:d:403480

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan

More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().