Cost Comparison between Digital Management and Traditional Management of Cotton Fields—Evidence from Cotton Fields in Xinjiang, China

Lantong Shao, Jiaqin Gong, Wenqing Fan, Zongyi Zhang and Meng Zhang
Additional contact information
Lantong Shao: Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China
Jiaqin Gong: XAG, Guangzhou 510000, China
Wenqing Fan: XAG, Guangzhou 510000, China
Zongyi Zhang: China Institute for Agricultural Equipment Industry Development, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
Meng Zhang: Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China

Agriculture, 2022, vol. 12, issue 8, 1-18

Abstract: Cotton, as an important cash crop and strategic material, is widely planted in Xinjiang, China. In the traditional way, the management of the cotton field is extensive and the cost is huge. This paper analyzed the economic benefits and the related influence factors of cotton field management digitalization by collecting costs from 2020 of four major tasks in field management in Xinjiang, China. These four main tasks included field scouting, plant protection, topping and irrigation. By analyzing the intersection of the average cost curves of each major task in field management, we obtained the critical size of digital agriculture replacing traditional agriculture. Then, we used sensitivity analysis to find the main factors affecting the promotion and application of digital agricultural equipment. The results show: (1) at a certain critical size, the use of digital agricultural equipment can reduce the cost of production compared to traditional agriculture. However, the critical size varies for different management segments. (2) Fixed equipment costs, labor costs, water costs and energy costs have a large impact on the critical size. On large-scale cotton farms, digital agriculture tends to be more economical than traditional agriculture. In the future, as the cost of fixed equipment decreases, and labor costs and water costs rise, the critical size of digital agriculture replacing traditional agriculture will get smaller, and the scope of the economic benefits of digital cotton field management will increase further.

Keywords: technological progress in agriculture; digital agriculture; cotton field; cost analysis; sensitivity analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1105/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1105/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:8:p:1105-:d:873245

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan

More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().