Moral Hypocrisy, Power and Social Preferences

Aldo Rustichini and Marie Claire Villeval

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: We show with a laboratory experiment that individuals adjust their moral principles to the situation and to their actions, just as much as they adjust their actions to their principles. We first elicit the individuals' principles regarding the fairness and unfairness of allocations in three different scenarios (a Dictator game, an Ultimatum game, and a Trust game). One week later, the same individuals are invited to play those same games with monetary compensation. Finally in the same session we elicit again their principles regarding the fairness and unfairness of allocations in the same three scenarios. Our results show that individuals adjust abstract norms to fit the game, their role and the choices they made. First, norms that appear abstract and universal take into account the bargaining power of the two sides. The strong side bends the norm in its favor and the weak side agrees : Stated fairness is a compromise with power. Second, in most situations, individuals adjust the range of fair shares after playing the game for real money compared with their initial statement. Third, the discrepancy between hypothetical and real behavior is larger in games where real choices have no strategic consequence (Dictator game and second mover in Trust game) than in those where they do (Ultimatum game). Finally the adjustment of principles to actions is mainly the fact of individuals who behave more selfishly and who have a stronger bargaining power. The moral hypocrisy displayed (measured by the discrepancy between statements and actions chosen followed by an adjustment of principles to actions) appears produced by the attempt, not necessarily conscious, to strike a balance between self-image and immediate convenience.

Keywords: Moral hypocrisy; fairness; social preferences; power; self-deception (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec, nep-cbe, nep-evo, nep-exp, nep-gth, nep-hpe and nep-soc
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00702578v2
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00702578v2/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Moral hypocrisy, power and social preferences (2014)
Working Paper: Moral hypocrisy, power and social preferences (2014)
Working Paper: Moral Hypocrisy, Power and Social Preferences (2012)
Working Paper: Moral Hypocrisy, Power and Social Preferences (2012)
Working Paper: Moral Hypocrisy, Power and Social Preferences (2012)
Working Paper: Moral Hypocrisy, Power and Social Preferences (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00702578

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().