Accounting for Protest Attitudes in Willingness to Pay for Universal Health Coverage
Mohammad Abu-Zaineh,
Olivier Chanel and
Khaled Makhloufi
Additional contact information
Khaled Makhloufi: AMU MED - Aix-Marseille Université - Faculté de médecine - AMU - Aix Marseille Université, SESSTIM - U1252 INSERM - Aix Marseille Univ - UMR 259 IRD - Sciences Economiques et Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
Working Papers from HAL
Abstract:
In their attempts to implement universal health coverage (UHC), different developing countries encounter different types of obstacles. In Tunisia, major challenges include a widespread informal sector and protestors' general discontent with rising economic insecurity and inequality, the rollback of the state and public welfare. We apply a contingent valuation survey to a non-healthcare-covered Tunisian sample vis-à-vis joining and paying for a health insurance scheme. We pay attention to the nature of the willingness- to-pay (WTP) values obtained, distinguishing genuine null from protest values. The latter may reflect not only protesters' beliefs regarding the survey, but also their lack of trust in government's commitment to ensuring the provision of quality healthcare. We use alternative econometric modeling strategies to account and correct for selection issues arising from protest answers. Our results support the presence of self- selection and, by predicting protesters' WTP, allow the "true" sample mean WTP to be computed. This appears to be about 14% higher than the elicited mean WTP. The WTP of the poorest non-covered respondents represents about one and a half times the current contributions of the poorest formal sector enrollees, suggesting that voluntary affiliation to the formal health insurance scheme could be a step towards achieving UHC. Overall, we highlight the importance of taking into account protest positions for the evaluation of progress towards UHC.
Keywords: willingness-to-pay; self-selection; protest attitude; contingent valuation; universal health coverage (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ara and nep-ias
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01962176v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01962176v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Accounting for Protest Attitudes in Willingness to Pay for Universal Health Coverage 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01962176
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().