EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Scrooge Posing as Mother Teresa: How Hypocritical Social Responsibility Strategies Hurt Employees and Firms

Sabrina Scheidler (sabrina.scheidler@rub.de), Laura Marie Edinger-Schons (schons@bwl.uni-mannheim.de), Jelena Spanjol (spanjol@bwl.lmu.de) and Jan Wieseke (jan.wieseke@rub.de)
Additional contact information
Sabrina Scheidler: University of Bochum
Laura Marie Edinger-Schons: University of Mannheim
Jelena Spanjol: Munich School of Management
Jan Wieseke: University of Bochum

Journal of Business Ethics, 2019, vol. 157, issue 2, No 4, 339-358

Abstract: Abstract Extant research provides compelling conceptual and empirical arguments that company-external (e.g., philanthropic) as well as company-internal (i.e., employee-directed) CSR efforts positively affect employees, but does so largely in studies assessing effects from the two CSR types independently of each other. In contrast, this paper investigates external–internal CSR jointly, examining the effects of (in)consistent external–internal CSR strategies on employee attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. The research takes a social and moral identification theory view and advances the core hypothesis that inconsistent CSR strategies, defined as favoring external over internal stakeholders, trigger employees’ perceptions of corporate hypocrisy which, in turn, lead to emotional exhaustion and turnover. In Study 1, a cross-industry employee survey (n = 3410) indicates that inconsistent CSR strategies with larger external than internal efforts increase employees’ turnover intentions via perceived corporate hypocrisy and emotional exhaustion. In Study 2, a multi-source secondary dataset (n = 1902) demonstrates that inconsistent CSR strategies increase firms’ actual employee turnover. Combined, the two studies demonstrate the importance of taking into account the interests of both external and internal stakeholders of the firm when researching and managing CSR.

Keywords: Corporate social responsibility (CSR); Corporate hypocrisy; Inconsistent CSR strategies; Employee emotional exhaustion.; Employee turnover; Social and moral identification theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (45)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-018-3788-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:157:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-018-3788-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10551/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-018-3788-3

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Ethics is currently edited by Michelle Greenwood and R. Edward Freeman

More articles in Journal of Business Ethics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla (sonal.shukla@springer.com) and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (indexing@springernature.com).

 
Page updated 2024-12-28
Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:157:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-018-3788-3