Economists, Incentives, Judgement and Empirical Work

David Colander

Middlebury College Working Paper Series from Middlebury College, Department of Economics

Abstract: This paper asks the question: Why has the “general-to-specific” cointegrated VAR approach as developed in Europe had only limited success in the US as a tool for doing empirical macroeconomics, where what might be called a “theory comes first” approach dominates? The reason this paper highlights is the incompatibility of the European approach with the US focus on the journal publication metric for advancement. Specifically, the European “general-to specific” cointegrated VAR approach requires researcher judgment to be part of the analysis, and the US focus on a journal publication metric discourages such research methods. The US “theory comes first” approach fits much better with the journal publication metric.

Pages: 13 pages
Date: 2008-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm, nep-hpe and nep-sog
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.middlebury.edu/services/econ/repec/mdl/ancoec/0806.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Economists, Incentives, Judgment, and Empirical Work (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mdl:mdlpap:0806

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Middlebury College Working Paper Series from Middlebury College, Department of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vijaya Wunnava (vwunnava@middlebury.edu).