The effect of horizontal mergers, when firms compete in prices and investments

Massimo Motta () and Emanuele Tarantino

No 17-01, Working Papers from University of Mannheim, Department of Economics

Abstract: It has been suggested that mergers, by increasing concentration, raise incentives to invest and hence are pro-competitive. To study the effects of mergers, we rewrite a game with simultaneous price and cost-reducing investment choices as one where firms only choose prices, and make use of aggregative game theory. We find no support for that claim: absent effciency gains, the merger lowers total investments and consumer surplus.Only if it entails suffcient effciency gains, will it be pro-competitive. We also show there exist classes of models for which the results obtained with cost-reducing investments are equivalent to those with quality-enhancing investments.

JEL-codes: D43 K22 L13 L41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-gth, nep-law, nep-mic and nep-mkt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (47)

Downloads: (external link)
https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/42805/1/17-01_Motta%2C%20Tarantino.pdf

Related works:
Journal Article: The effect of horizontal mergers, when firms compete in prices and investments (2021)
Working Paper: The Effect of Horizontal Mergers, When Firms compete in Prices and Investments (2018)
Working Paper: The Effect of Horizontal Mergers, when Firms Compete in Prices and Investments (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mnh:wpaper:42805

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Mannheim, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Katharina Rautenberg ().