Digging the Dirt at Public Expense: Governance in the Building of the Erie Canal and Other Public Works

Stanley Engerman and Kenneth Sokoloff

No 10965, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: The Erie Canal was a mammoth public works project undertaken largely because the scope of the investment was beyond what a private firm could manage during the early 19th century. As with most public works, there were ample opportunities for public officials to realize private gains from the effort, and many did. On the whole, however, the construction of the Erie Canal (and most other major public works projects of the era) appears to have been well conceived and executed; it not only paid off more than its costs through tolls, but also generated substantial welfare improvements for the residents of the state of New York in the form of producer and consumer surplus and a wide range of positive externalities. Although there was obviously some fraud and mismanagement, the public authorities carried out the work at costs relatively close to those projected at the point of authorization. In an effort to try to place this episode in a broader perspective, we compare the ratio of actual expenditures on construction relative to the estimated costs at the time of authorization for the Erie Canal, to those for a range of other public works over American history up to the present day. It is our contention that this measure, albeit quite narrow in focus, is informative about the quality of governance of public resources. We highlight how, by this standard, the governance of public resources during the canal era stands up well in comparison with what we have seen since. Indeed, the cost overrun ratios have risen sharply over the last half-century, coinciding with both a marked increase in the relative size of the government sector as well as sustained economic growth. These patterns suggest how important it is that better measures and other means of systematically studying how the prevalence and effects of corruption vary across different contexts be developed.

JEL-codes: H4 N10 O1 O2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004-12
Note: DAE
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Published as Glaeser, Edward L. and Claudia Goldin (eds.) Corruption and Reform: Lessons from America's Economic History (National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report). Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 2006.
Published as Digging the Dirt at Public Expense: Digging the Dirt at Public Expense Erie Canal and Other Public Works , Stanley L. Engerman, Kenneth L. Sokoloff. in Corruption and Reform: Lessons from America's Economic History , Glaeser and Goldin. 2006

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w10965.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:10965

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w10965

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().