Strategic Judicial Decision Making
Pablo Spiller and
Rafael Gely
No 13321, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
This survey paper starts from the basic, and intuitive, assumption that judges are human and as such, can be modeled in the same fashion we model politicians, activists, managers: driven by well-defined preferences, behaving in a purposive and forward-looking fashion. We explore, then, the role politics play in judicial decision-making. We provide a brief overview of what is called the "strategic approach," compare it to alternative approaches to understand judicial behavior, and offer some concluding thoughts about the future of positive analyses of judicial decision-making.
JEL-codes: K0 K4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law
Note: LE POL
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Published as Strategic Judicial Decision-making Pablo T. Spiller and Rafael Gely The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics Print Publication Date: Aug 2008 Subject: Political Science, Law and Politics Online Publication Date: Sep 2009 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0003
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w13321.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Strategic Judicial Decision Making (2007) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:13321
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w13321
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().