EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Better LATE Than Nothing: Some Comments on Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzua (2009)

Guido Imbens

No 14896, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: Two recent papers, Deaton (2009), and Heckman and Urzua (2009), argue against what they see as an excessive and inappropriate use of experimental and quasi-experimental methods in empirical work in economics in the last decade. They specifically question the increased use of instrumental variables and natural experiments in labor economics, and of randomized experiments in development economics. In these comments I will make the case that this move towards shoring up the internal validity of estimates, and towards clarifying the description of the population these estimates are relevant for, has been important and beneficial in increasing the credibility of empirical work in economics. I also address some other concerns raised by the Deaton and Heckman-Urzua papers.

JEL-codes: C10 C50 C90 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
Note: LS
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (226)

Published as Guido W. Imbens, 2010. "Better LATE Than Nothing: Some Comments on Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzua (2009)," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(2), pages 399-423, June.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w14896.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Better LATE Than Nothing: Some Comments on Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzua (2009) (2010) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:14896

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w14896

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:14896