Conveniently Upset: Avoiding Altruism by Distorting Beliefs About Others
Rafael Di Tella and
Ricardo Perez-Truglia
No 16645, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
In this paper we present the results from a "corruption game" (a dictator game modified so that the second player can accept a side payment that reduces the overall size of the pie). Dictators (silently) treated to have the possibility of taking a larger proportion of the recipient's tokens, take more of them. They were also more likely to report believing that the recipient would accept a low price in exchange for a side payment; and selected larger numbers as their best guess of the likely proportion of recipients acting "unfairly". The results favor the hypothesis that people avoid altruistic actions by distorting beliefs about others.
JEL-codes: E62 P16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp and nep-soc
Note: POL
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Published as Rafael Di Tella & Ricardo Perez-Truglia & Andres Babino & Mariano Sigman, 2015. "Conveniently Upset: Avoiding Altruism by Distorting Beliefs about Others' Altruism," American Economic Review, vol 105(11), pages 3416-3442.
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w16645.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:16645
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w16645
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by (wpc@nber.org).