Optimal Capital Versus Labor Taxation with Innovation-Led Growth
Philippe Aghion,
Ufuk Akcigit and
Jesus Fernandez-Villaverde
No 19086, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
Chamley (1986) and Judd (1985) showed that, in a standard neoclassical growth model with capital accumulation and infinitely lived agents, either taxing or subsidizing capital cannot be optimal in the steady state. In this paper, we introduce innovation-led growth into the Chamley-Judd framework, using a Schumpeterian growth model where productivity-enhancing innovations result from profit-motivated R&D investment. Our main result is that, for a given required trend of public expenditure, a zero tax/subsidy on capital becomes suboptimal. In particular, the higher the level of public expenditure and the income elasticity of labor supply, the less should capital income be subsidized and the more it should be taxed. Not taxing capital implies that labor must be taxed at a higher rate. This in turn has a detrimental effect on labor supply and therefore on the market size for innovation. At the same time, for a given labor supply, taxing capital also reduces innovation incentives, so that for low levels of public expenditure and/or labor supply elasticity it becomes optimal to subsidize capital income.
JEL-codes: H2 O3 O4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge, nep-ino, nep-pbe and nep-pub
Note: IO
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (38)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w19086.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Optimal Capital Versus Labor Taxation with Innovation-Led Growth (2013) 
Working Paper: Optimal Capital Versus Labor Taxation with Innovation-Led Growth (2012) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19086
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w19086
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().