EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Austerity in 2009-2013

Alberto Alesina, Omar Barbiero, Carlo Favero (), Francesco Giavazzi () and Matteo Paradisi

No 20827, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: The conventional wisdom is (i) that fiscal austerity was the main culprit for the recessions experienced by many countries, especially in Europe, since 2010 and (ii) that this round of fiscal consolidation was much more costly than past ones. The contribution of this paper is a clarification of the first point and, if not a clear rejection, at least it raises doubts on the second. In order to obtain these results we construct a new detailed "narrative" data set which documents the actual size and composition of the fiscal plans implemented by several countries in the period 2009-2013. Out of sample simulations, that project output growth conditional only upon the fiscal plans implemented since 2009 do reasonably well in predicting the total output fluctuations of the countries in our sample over the years 2010-13 and are also capable of explaining some of the cross-country heterogeneity in this variable. Fiscal adjustments based upon cuts in spending appear to have been much less costly, in terms of output losses, than those based upon tax increases. The difference between the two types of adjustment is very large. Our results, however, are mute on the question whether the countries we have studied did the right thing implementing fiscal austerity at the time they did, that is 2009-13. Finally we examine whether this round of fiscal adjustments, which occurred after a financial and banking crisis, has had different effects on the economy compared to earlier fiscal consolidations carried out in "normal" times. When we test this hypothesis we do not reject the null, although in some cases failure to reject is marginal. In other words, we don't find sufficient evidence to claim that the recent rounds of fiscal adjustment, when compared with those occurred before the crisis, have been especially costly for the economy.

JEL-codes: C51 C53 E62 H60 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac
Note: IFM ME POL
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (57)

Published as in "Economic Policy," Volume 30, Issue 83, July 2015, Pages 383–437, https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiv006

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w20827.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Austerity in 2009-2013 (2015) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:20827

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w20827

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:20827