Opening up Military Innovation: Causal Effects of Reforms to U.S. Defense Research

Sabrina T. Howell, Jason Rathje, John van Reenen and Jun Wong

No 28700, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: For governments procuring innovation, one choice is whether to specify desired products (a “Conventional” approach) or allow firms to suggest ideas (an “Open” approach). Using a U.S. Air Force R&D grant program, where Open and Conventional competitions were held simultaneously, we find that Open awards increase both commercial innovation and technology adoption by the military. In contrast, Conventional awards have no positive effects on new technology, but do create more program lock-in. We present evidence that openness matters independently from inducing differential selection, for example of less well-established firms. These results suggest benefits from open approaches to innovation procurement.

JEL-codes: H56 H57 O31 O32 O33 O36 O38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ppm
Note: IO PE PR
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w28700.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28700

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w28700

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().