Are E-Bike Subsidies Cost Effective in Mitigating Carbon Emissions?

Anders Anderson, Harrison Hong and Eline Jacobs

No 29913, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: E-bike subsidies are used in a number of large carbon-emitting countries. Evaluating their cost effectiveness in reducing emissions is more complicated than for other durable green goods since e-bike owners might not substitute away from driving. We evaluate a representative Swedish subsidy program by combining administrative, insurance, car registry and survey data. We find a complete passthrough of the subsidy to consumers, which incentivized a doubling of e-bike sales. For the 90,000 individuals in our subsidy sample, we find however only a small substitution from driving based on registry estimates, much smaller than reported by subsidy recipients in surveys. The cost of carbon would have to be $800 per ton for the program to be cost effective. We also address additionality, coincidental benefits and alternative more cost-effective e-bike subsidy designs.

JEL-codes: H2 H20 H21 H22 H23 R4 R48 R49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-env and nep-pbe
Note: EEE
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w29913.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:29913

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w29913

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().